Mobile Web Has a Long Way to Grow

For years, the Mobile World Congress has issued the promise that the mobile Web will one day be more like the traditional Internet that we access from our PCs. But GigaOm notes there’s too much variation in operating systems and end devices, which makes it hard for developers to build applications for a mobile phone. In other words, a shakeout needs to occur, a leader needs to emerge.

But there’s a greater problem, here: according to Wikipedia, U.S. smartphone (loosely described as a phone with PC-like functionality) penetration is only expected to hit 10 percent this year. Most of these handsets have different interfaces: touch-screen, scroll wheel, stylus or keyboard. This requires different operating systems. There are six vying for control of that market: (in order of market share) Symbian OS, Linux, Windows Mobile, RIM BlackBerry, Palm OS, and Apple’s OS X.

What we have here is a market maturity problem. For starters, smartphone penetration has a long way to grow. Once it reaches 30 or so percent, leaders will emerge in the handset and OS markets. Then software developers can create more and better programs that scale, and advertisers will have a sizable audience and quality programs to buy space on. But we’re talking years, not months. -

Using the Mobile Web is a Sticky Proposition

Another Mobile World Congress, and another week full of promises coming out of the wireless industry that we will find eventually use our mobile phones to access the web much like we use our PCs. While I do believe we’re closer (and some give the iPhone credit for this), I still think the finish line is far off. The cage match du jour, the fight between Linux operating systems offered by Google and the LiMo Foundation, underscores one of the big difficulties of using the mobile phone for a rich Internet experience.

There’s too much variation in operating systems and end devices, which makes it hard for developers to build applications for a mobile phone. Obviously people recognized this when it came to building applications for social networks (see: Open Social), but efforts to build platforms that span mobile phones are nascent. One problem lies with the hardware, which varies from simple phones that serve mostly to make voice calls to smartphones that have the processing power to handle Office documents or broadcast television. There’s also an interface issue, such as whether it’s a touch screen, a scroll wheel, stylus or keypad.

Seriously, aside from finger cramps, anyone using a keypad to navigate the web is going to get really frustrated really quickly. Designing a browsing experience and services to optimize so much variety general results in designing for the lowest common denominator, or cutting them out entirely, and sticking with the few that have smartphones.

But the big problem is software — there’s too many operating systems to choose from. So the open platform zeitgeist is going mobile. AOL unveiled its open mobile developers platform earlier this week at the World Congress, based on technology assets it acquired from Airmedia, so it won’t be real until this summer. The platform allows a programmer to build applications for up to 150 different handsets using a variety of operating systems, but requires a client on each mobile phone.

Also trying to make the development side easier is Streamezzo, a Parisian startup that has raised $48 million to create its cross-platform software development kit. The kit won’t be available until Feb. 25, and requires a client on the end user’s handset. SFR, France’s second-largest mobile carrier, is running applications built on the Streamezzo SDK. Yahoo has launched a mobile widget development platform as well that went live this week, after being announced at CES in January..

On of the more interesting approaches is being taken by Chicago-based Novarra, an eight-year-old company that is working with carriers including Vodafone, U.S. Cellular and 3 Hong Kong to deliver the web to any phone, even low-end handsets. Novarra offers an appliance for carriers or a service that essentially offloads 80 percent of the data processing associated with downloading a web site to servers run by the carrier or Novarra. This cuts down on the amount of data traveling over the carrier network, and makes load times faster. Content providers such as Yahoo also use it to deliver lighter applications for mobile phones. Novarra powers Yahoo’s oneSearch via mobile.

Novarra’s success at driving data usage among its customers’ end users is exhibited by an increase of between $5 and $15 in ARPU for the carriers deploying the Novarra software. One only needs to look at AT&T’s recent profits, which were driven by wireless growth, to realize that pushing easier access to the Internet for all will drive revenue for carriers. The key is making it as convenient to use the web on a mobile phone as it is to use it from a computer.

Stacey Higginbotham, Friday, February 15, 2008 at 12:00 AM PT 

(c) 2008 MediaPost Communications, 1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
9 Responses to “What Up With The Mobile Web?”
 

Hi - just wanted to say good design and blog - cu

Max wrote on March 2nd, 2008 at 2:31 am

 

With The Mobile Web? | Wisdm.biz is a quite interesting post but quite difficult to understand for me.

Max wrote on March 11th, 2008 at 12:56 pm

 

Max,

As the technology develops and we see additional users in the market, we will also see applications and content change, making it easier to understand and use.

Please check-in from time to time, so you are able to stay on top of new and interesting developments.

Kindest Regards,
Drake Morton
http://www.wisdm.biz

info wrote on March 11th, 2008 at 5:32 pm

 

I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100%, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong.

Max wrote on April 5th, 2008 at 4:36 am

 

This article sounds well, but how everything is related together?

Max wrote on April 28th, 2008 at 1:36 am

 

I am not sure that I can completely understand your comments. Would you be so kind as to expand on your reasoning a little more before I comment.

MDavis wrote on May 1st, 2008 at 1:26 am

 

I never thought i will find this much information on With The Mobile Web? | Wisdm.biz today. Nice post mate - keep up the good work.

Anonymous wrote on May 2nd, 2008 at 6:31 pm

 

I don’t mean to be too in your face, but I’m not sure I agree with this. Anyhow, thanks for sharing and I think I’ll come to this blog more often.

Max wrote on May 23rd, 2008 at 8:33 pm

 

I read similar article also named With The Mobile Web? | Wisdm.biz, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me

Daniel wrote on May 25th, 2008 at 2:29 am

Leave a Reply